Recommend an Artist

Structured recommendations for editorial consideration.

Recommendations are reviewed using a structured editorial and legal framework. The strongest recommendations provide clear context, verifiable references, and a concise rationale for relevance. Submissions that include unverified claims or unclear rights for media assets may require additional documentation before review can proceed.

Submit recommendations to: Email: recommend-an-artist@thearttimes.com

Include a short rationale (4–8 lines), links to representative work, and any professional context that supports evaluation. Avoid sending sensitive personal data by email.

What to include (recommended structure)

  1. Artist identification: full name, studio location (city/country), primary medium
  2. Portfolio: 2–4 links to representative work (official site preferred)
  3. Context: short bio (3–6 lines), selected exhibitions or publications (if applicable)
  4. Why now: relevance, recent body of work, award, exhibition, or notable development
  5. Contacts: artist contact or representation (if available), plus your relationship/disclosure
  6. Rights clarity: if any images/video are attached, include credits and permission status

Review principles

  • Editorial decisions are based on relevance, quality, verification, timing, and legal clarity.
  • Conflicts of interest must be disclosed (representation, financial relationship, paid collaboration, etc.).
  • Recommendations do not guarantee coverage, publication, or a feature.

FAQ

How should an artist recommendation be submitted?
Goal: Ensure a review-ready submission.
Include: Artist name, location, primary medium, 2–4 portfolio links, and a concise rationale.
Send to: recommend-an-artist@thearttimes.com (Subject: Support | Recommend an Artist)
Expected reply: Confirmation of receipt or follow-up questions for verification.
What information is required to evaluate an artist professionally?
Goal: Enable structured editorial evaluation.
Include: Short bio (3–6 lines), representative works, exhibition history (selected), press references, and contact/representation details.
Note: Claims should be verifiable.
Expected reply: Request for additional documentation if required.
Are images, video, or documents required — and what rights are needed?
Goal: Prevent rights conflicts.
Include: Only assets you have permission to share.
Required: Clear credits, usage permission status, and (if applicable) releases for identifiable individuals.
Note: Unresolved rights may pause or stop publication review.
Can galleries, institutions, advisors, or collectors submit recommendations?
Goal: Clarify eligible recommenders.
Yes. Recommendations are accepted from professionals and the public.
Include: Your professional role and relationship to the artist (e.g., independent, represented, advisor, institution).
Disclosure: Conflicts of interest must be stated.
Does a recommendation guarantee coverage, a feature, or publication?
Goal: Set expectations.
No. Recommendations do not guarantee coverage.
Decisions are based on relevance, quality, verification, timing, and legal clarity.
What is the typical response timeline?
Goal: Set realistic expectations.
Timelines vary by volume and verification requirements.
Include: Any hard deadlines and the reason for urgency.
Expected reply: Routing and an estimated review window when possible.
How should sensitive personal data be handled?
Goal: Reduce privacy risk.
Do not send sensitive personal data by email.
Share only public/professional information necessary for evaluation.
If identity verification becomes necessary, instructions will be provided.
What should the subject line be?
Goal: Speed up routing.
Use exactly: Support | Recommend an Artist
This improves triage and reduces handling time.

If routing is unclear or the recommendation concerns a technical or rights issue, contact support for coordination: Contact support.